So What is "New Age Religion"

John Fugelsang had this woman running for congress named Maryanne, who spoke of the problem with liberalism being that it has abandoned spirituality and "Faith".   There was also talk about the phrase "New Age" falling under suspicion.  Well, there is a saying "if you're a hammer- - then everything you see looks like a nail".  So my role as a hammer, by instinct is to nail those loose nails down so they don't stuck up and snag somebody.  What I see myself as going, and I hope you readers agree, is to 'lift the veil" and see the puppet masters behind the curtain who are controlling everything.  For instance to me the word "spiritual" signified nothing to me- - in terms of the conotation John Fugelsang would like.  It's like saying "I believe in carbon based life forms".  To me, as I alluded in the last posting and in which Paul the Apostle agree "spirituality" has in itself no generic conotation of ethics or morality.  But John Fugelsang and others such as Thom Hartman and Jim Ward have spoken of "the Real Jesus".  And they do right to say there was a Jeshuah - - or one of the "Five Messiahs" or composit characters Christianity is - - partially based on.  This Jeshuah - - had his base not in Jerusalem, not even in Galilee- - at least at first but around Mt Carmel.  This is where the Nazarites were most prevelent according to on line research.  In terms of the "second coming" prophecies, these I believe were lifted from the sayings of - - - John the Baptist, also known as Stewart Sutcliffe, and also code named Raphael in some Federation writings.  When the Baptist spoke of the "coming of the Son of Man" he was referring to not Jeshuah - - but rather "That Egyption' referred to in Acts, and in the historic writings of Tassitus of a prophet who spoke of the corruption of the Jewish Temple- - whose life we have elaborated on before.  It is my belief that these were the first Christians- - whom we refer to cosmically as the Crestorians.  The upside down cross referrs not to Peter's death but rather to the death of Judas - - on the cross.  A beaurocratic snaffoo occurred and the "Innocent" was accidently let go and the "Guilty" was accidently crucified.  My readers know all of this.  We have two other Messiahs.  Sometimes Acts referrs to things lifted from Tassitus writingts that hadn't happened yet.  One of these was the "school of Tyannus" which was the death of a fourth Messiah named Apalonius around AD 105 or 110.   The Fifth Messiah was the one alluded to that web post that said that "Jesus wasn't a historical figure at all".  Was it Luigee Cascioli or something - - some Italian.  According to him perhaps based on a romanticized biography- - that Thaddius had a brother named Jonah or we would say "John", and it was this John that had all of the brothers such as Thaddius and Simon and James, with Biblical connection.  This John indeed did have his headquarters on the Sea of Galilee.  This Jonah lived around 45 or 50 AD.   It was his brother Thaddius that fomented a revolution.  Perhaps Simon (the Zealot) his brother, was also involved in this failed uprising in the north.  But just to assure John Fugelsang- - the moral teachings we all know and charish- - were from that Jeshuah messiah- - who according to Federation sources WAS baptized by John- - but John looked into his eyes and had an instant distrust of him.  This is because John was loyal to "That Egyptian".

Before we get to the next paragraph where you think I'm completely nuts- - let's talk about the idea of Peace and Love and Faith and all of that.  I think it is definitely a good idea to have some Ethical guiding light so to speak or to somehow have a philosophy of life which keeps us focused and on the track.  I think - - synic that I am with an under-current of Atheism - - that Religion could be used as a propaganda tool of the Left to give us appeal to groups whom we normally would not be appealing to.  After the words "Godless" and Atheist are kind of scarey words to many.  They see the progressive movement and liberalism as a wrenching away of the 'American Values we all hold so near and dear".  But let it be known that we Progressives know how to read the Bible, as well as the Constitution as well, and I believe Better, than any of them do.  As you know in my writings I have settled on seven cardinal Virtues and seven cardinal Vices.  I won't review these now.  We have done so in the past.  But that's just Me.  I'd like to think I'm Perfect, but other disagree.  If we could perhaps rephrase a saying of Abraham Lincoln, perhaps we should ask "Not whether Morality is on our side" but rather - - Whether we are on the side of Morality".   Or in psychological military terms - - it's referred to as "Taking the moral high ground".  It's always been my contention that one Argues best when one comes from a position of Strength.  I think the way Jesus put it was - - like the lyrics of that song "Don't build your house on the sandy place; don't build it too near the Shore, well it may look kind of nice, but you'll have to build it twice, yes you'll have to build your House once more".   I am honestly puzzled how the Tea Party ever got as far as they have being as morally bankrupt as they are.  The best rationalization or explanation I can come up with is "If it's in the Stars- - then it's Destined to Happen".  Clearly we on the Left have done a poor job of "Getting our message out".  If John Fugelsang has any ideas how to do this better than we are doing it - - I'm all ears".

As powerful as the Koch Brothers are, they do not figure in any of these plans for "The World Tomorrow" and neither for that matter does Garner Ted Armstrong.  We mentioned the Presbyterian Church.  So why are we picking on them?  "Only the shadow knows!", which is another way of saying "I'm not going to tell you that - - at least today".  But just think - - of all those groups the Koch Brothers influence and support - - NONE of them is involved in this dark side of the "New Age" when it comes, and not that long off.  However what is probably a major competetor to the Koch Brothers - - does.  Of these Big Four corporations - - one is what you'd call a chemical company, one is an entertainment company, the third could be called a tech or electronics company, and the fourth is a bank, and we've named all four before - but we won't here.  (Aren't we stinkers)  I screwed up big time with a first name in the paragraph below leaving a lot of people wondering whether I was trying to be funny or sarcastic and I assure you it was just a mental lapse.  One of these four might be called "The most Evil corporation ever to exist in Planet Earth.  The second of the four Mal Evans said of recently "They are champions at propaganda, and in fast are one of the most unchristian, not to mention ungodly companies ever to get their particular warped on human nature message out there."  He then added after a bit "And if you're a feminist, you should positively loathe this corporation.   We told you about a month ago that the Tea Party was "definitely on its way out".  They are not "Part of the Plan" so to speak.  Certainly John Fugelsang and Stephanie Miller should take heart in this.  But in the words of the Dead Kennedies, "We've got a Bigger Problem Now", which at this point seems hard to imagine, but just Trust Me on this point.

We now move on to the spiritual forces behind the curtain.  When people think "New Age" they think of the "Age of Aquarius" a fifth dimension song.  The Fifth Dimension is from a group we call "Aquein" note the spelling.  The word translates as "well digger".  Many when they speak of New Age- - have in mind books by psychics such as Sylvia Brown or Ruth Montgomery or Jeane Dixon.   These are "Miami DES RHO"   - - and as you know there is also a Chicago Des Rho - - not under discussion today.  Also in this Miami Des Rho group is the Church of Scientology.  But classic Hippies and the so called "Love Crowd" or flower children- - what they most likely refer to as New Age is- - the Andromeda Federation  - - either the D, E, or F variety.  Oddly there is a historic "Southern Tradition" in this Andromeda culture- - which may be a little hard to swallow for those who have seen 'Easy Rider".   Strangely the Andromedans are shielded somehow from the influence of Alcyonne.  Alcyonne is widely viewed as a source of Evil in this section of the Cosmos.  However the Reigelians- - are protected from Alcyonne in a different way by what is known as "The Reigelian Imminuty factor".   However some uses of the phrase "New Age" has nothing to do with any of these unidenfied groups.  It is pointed out that the world "Tomorrow" is used in the propaganda of three out of the "deadly four" commercial entities who are of the 'White Horse" group- - - and one would reason that the word "Tomorrow" would also occur in the litriture of the forth also.  I would like to talk about these four corporations "Of Tomorrow' as one might say, but you know the adage "Tomorrow has concerns for itself".  But what makes the White Horse group suddenly a lot more suspicious than they were is that they have "been given the nod by Alcyonne".   Remember back when we said "Whoever Alcyonne gives the nod to - is the winner".   This was primarily what we were referring to.  The bottom line is - - if your bread is buttered on a certain side- - when push comes to shove, you will "cleve" to use a Biblical.word- - to the one who is paying your salary, so to speak, or "giving you the power" and as such you will be willing to perhaps sacrifice old Friendships and people you formerly trusted and formerly trusted you - - to accomplish this.  Only people of strong Moral Principles will be able to totally resist this - - bias.  As such ye who deal with these "emplowered groups" must know that - - whatever you assumed about them before - - may no longer be true.  (meditate on this truth for a moment before we move on)  I wanted to mention the Beta Centaurians just briefly here.  Both the Romulans and the Federation have called Andromeda "soft on Beta Centaurians".   But since the Centaurians- - - don't trust Alcyonne either- - here the empowering factor is the Edomites.  And we told you about the Sutterans.   This is a group that is VERY dependant on the "grace" or empowerment of Alcyonne.  We have spoken of "garden variety Demons" such as one imagines when one watches a movie like the Exorcist- - these are actually what we call "Alcyonized Sudderans".   Perhaps all of this is more than you wanted to know- - but these first two paragraphs have been kind of a review anyhow.

I wanted to talk about Dianne Feinstein and the CIA.  One should try and catch her forty minute "report" speech to the Senate covering the past eight or nine years or so with Congress' interaction with the CIA.  Larry Elder sees no problem with blowing the cover of an active CIA opperative, out of some political vendetta, no many how many people's lives are imperiled.  However Larry Elder also says it's important to keep all of these "Black Site opperations" secret.  These are sites in remote countries with few if any civil liberties- - where often Innocent people were "Renditioned" and taken off and Tortured and sometimes they were let go and I have no doubt others have just dropped off the face of the earth like that Malaysian flight 370.  Mrs Feinstein spoke in great detail covering the whole history of document requests and what happened each step along the way.  But finally she gets to her point.  The CIA broke into a private hard drive of a secured computer in the Capitol building where Congress had kept copies of CIA documents they had requested and which the CIA agreed to give.  Earlier like in 2010 Senator Feinstein would noticed that certain documents of the CIA had been walled away from access to Congress that had formerly been allowed to be viewed by Congress in compliance to the requests of Congress.  And now the CIA is going to the justice department and attempting to file charges against this Senate Committee including Mrs Feinstein, which Feinstein is not the least bit happy about.  And that's where we stand now.