They just announced the
ten contestants for Thursday’s Republican debate, and as suspected last night –
Rick Perry is the odd man out. There
were three ‘tied in ninth place” and the two of those final three who made the
cut were Governor Christie and John Kasech. I expect you know who the other eight are. You'll find out tomorrow night. Tomorrow's debate will be like the Superbowl of politics, a moment we've been waiting for for a long time. Stephanie says Rick Perry should have been included because he was ahead in the NBC and Wall Street journal polls. This would set up a conflict with Donald Trump because Rick Perry said "Trump is like a cancer on the fabric of conservativsm" and "Nobody with an attitude twords veterans he has should be running for President". The republicans had a “mini debate” last night. (OK cue up mini-Kiss) It included but was not limited to Ted
Cruz, Rick Perry, Carley Fiurina, Rick
Santorum, and John Kasech. I comment on
this debate held in New Hampshire, where the format was they’d have one
questioner asking one candidate at a time on particular topics, such as the
economy. I wrote Judy about this and
also talked about the chaos at Chase Bank yesterday, having rearranged all
their stuff to total unrecognizability.
I also got around to writing Dr Levy about you-know-who offering to
store my record collection at his house.
I haven’t checked back. I didn’t
even bother to ask Dr Levy the obvious questions like “What are you doing now”
or will you ever be back?
Last night I read a
thing in Washington’s blog that says the United States under President Obama is
ending the MAD or mutually assured destruction policy on Nuclear Weapons. We are now clearly going for “first strike”
technology, which is deemed doable now because the United States has moved far
out ahead of Russia in nuclear technology and numbers. The piece more than hints at the possibility
that the United States’ aim is to wipe Russia off the map, so that they won’t
be a trade competitor. And this is from
a June 2014 posting link. Perhaps this
reality is why the Orion Federation has turned against the US and toward the
pro Russian position in that conflict.
Netanyahu claims that
this treaty with Iran not only doesn’t block progress to the bomb but actually “paves
the pathway to the bomb”. He also said “Iran
wins whether they keep the treaty and they win if they break the treaty because
they still got the sanctions lifted to use for all manner of research and the
spread of terrorism throughout the Mideast”.
I guess this is a legitimate point of view if you take seriously this
talk of “Wiping Israel off the map” but others say this phrase is a mistranslation
of the Farsee that actually means “To disappear from the stage of history
because of their illigitamacy”. Let’s
review the specific terms of the treaty which “blocks every conceivable path to
a bomb”. They even have to get rid of
their spent Uranium. They say that
Uranium has to be enriched to 90% Uranium 235 in order to build an atom bomb,
and they only have twenty percent enrichment.
Normal uranium is U 238 with about one percent U 235. And for power plants for peace time use they
say it’s five percent enrichment to U235.
Of course U 235 is lighter than normal Uranium 238 and so the centrifuge
separates it out. But then there is a
plutonium path to the bomb also where U 235 can be bombarded with alpha
particles and be “transmuted” to Plutonium 239, which is four atomic weight
heavier. This is because alpha particles
have an atomic weight of four. And
apparently Plutonium gets you to building a bomb quicker. Of course we are reminded that hiding
radioactive material is not like flushing drugs down the toilet before the cops
break in. You know it’s there. I think if people think about this treaty
dispassionately and sanely they will defer to all the atomic experts that state
that all “paths to a bomb” are cut off, and that we will live in a safer world.
In Idaho it’s criminal
behavior to secretly record the abuse or slaughter of animals. The Dairyman group of Idaho got this bill
passed in February 2014. Of course if
you are on private property I guess it would be trespassing. But now they are going to put the thing
before Federal Court because they are pleading their first amendment rights are
being violated. The Judge said though
“It’s not the private property issue that concerns us, but it’s the negative
content”. I couldn’t believe that a
judge would be as blatant as that. Today
is Tuesday August 4, 2015 and I think it’s Obama’s birthdays, or at least one
of the dates.
The Rev Chuck Smith had an intriguing saying. He said "Once a person rejects Christianity they leave themselves open to anything". This line is meant to scare the congregation into not questioning anything told them by their leader and also into not "exploring' or questioning other beliefs. One of the key things that are "child like" (the way Jesus told believers to be) is that children question and explore. They make judgements - accepting certain things as proven knowledge- while rejecting others. In short it's known as Growth. This is something the so called "Christian believer" is shielded from in this adoption of what he calls "The Faith". It's a blank check to be just as big an asshole as you please- - to play the fool all the time, yet be shielded from any embarrassment. One thing I've learned as you get older is one has an increasing intollerance for stupid or unproven ideas. One of Bill Cosby's favorite lines with his TV children is "That's about the stupidest thing I've heard anybody say". Old people love to call people and things as "Stupid" and the others are supposed to rely in their wisdom and accept it. It strikes me that most of the "true believers" are younger people- - teenagers and young adults. This Calvary Chapel style Christianity seems to be something that one "grows out of" in time. But Republican dogma is much like this so called "Faith". You hear this endless series of talking points spouted by FOX news and Shawn Hannity. Most of these talking points are demonstrably false- - but never let facts get in the way of being a "True Believer". Indeed a definition of Faith just might be "A system of thought that shields the thinker from reality". A lot of the belief system of the right boils down to saying "The democrats are all basically like Bernie Sanders. They are democratic socialists. They are like the Bolshivicks of old except for one thing. They don't believe in acquiring their goals by military force. But the thing is if these democrats have their way- - with increasing loss of liberty (liberty: the freedom to take YOUR rights away) then they'll resort to military force. These right wingers lead you down a primrose path of thought. Maybe they start off with seven or eight "forms of government" but then they start "boiling it down" and become very bi-polar, and you're left with what they call "Liberty" and "Freedom" on one side- - - and this other democratic socialist thing that Chris Matthews talked about on Meet the Press last Sunday. He accused Bernie Sanders of being some kind of a soft Bolshivick - - who wants to eliminate capitalism and the free markets entirely- - when Bernie Sanders has advocated NOTHING like this. But those on the right NEED to believe this- - to break everything down to a bi-polar choice just as Chuck Smith would view the world in terms of "Once you reject the truth of Christianity you'll be open to anything" or restated more simply of "Once you fail to STAND UP for Christianity then you'll FALL for anything!"
We
had Swedish meatballs tonight with the usual heavy gravy. We had that curly colored pasta with that and
cauliflour. We had bread putting for
dessert. As I was standing to leave Dora
showed up with seconds on the meat balls, as the room was really thinning
out. Bill shows no inclination to come
in here. It seems that so many people
are offering the cat food now at different times, she is refusing it. But she’s eating for several now.







