Wednesday, November 11, 2009

Wondering Aloud (Again)

Sometimes you just need to sit back and ask questions because you don’t have the answers you’re looking for, and the answers others have given about “things” don’t really satisfy you. Well, the minute I get my “God” degree, I’ll be sure to pass the acquired knowledge along to you. But in the mean time we are wondering about things like why are our soldiers on our fourth and even fifth deployments in sort of a “back door draft” and we people in America aren’t doing thing about that. I’m not one of these Robert Kennedy types who cries “economic discrimination” at the drop of a hat. I believe there is such a thing as a “free market” and every young person has the Choice how they are going to spend their years after high school. If your poor and you can’t get a job or a job that pays decent wages thanks to people like Larry Elder, I see nothing wrong in the idea that you can sign up with Uncle Sam for a while and get some needed training to “make a man out of you” and give you all that needed discipline and such for life. People like Bobby Hayden and Pike (both alieases) show their maturety every day of the week. They are more established, settled people because both served in the military. And much as it may fly in the face of public opinion we must remember that all these wounded veterans or disabeled in other ways – they all had a Choice and made their choice to join. It’s not as if they were dragged off the streets kicking and screaming like they used to “Shanghai” people into the Navy in Britain. But people wonder about a lot of stuff today. We wonder how we are going to settle the moral questions that still vex society such as abortion and homosexuality and euthanasia. And now people are looking for answers in the Supernatural and states of Being that are beyond our present knowledge. Certainly there is no shortage of these inputs with movies out like “Paranormal” and “Close encounters of the Fourth kind” and such. And then we have TV and new shows like “V” and also “Flash Forward”. People are thinking about things that are still taboo to many sectors of society like talking with departed spirits such as in ‘Ghost Whisperer”. Now the movie to see is “2012”, which was heralded months ago with promos on the internet and which stimulated a lot of research on my part harkening me back to the “Age of Leo” when there was a thaw in the ice age that spawned high civilization, according to some. I think it’s a healthy thing to see where we have been because life tends, despite our best intention, to be liniar meaning that is not only Going someplace, but that we have Been someplace. People who discount where a person has been are in most cases kidding themselves. As Dr. Phil is so fond of saying “The best predictor of future behavior is past behavior” and I believe the same principle applies with direction vectors.

The Federation has its own slant on the coverage of Hassan, who killed those thirteen men on the base and wounded thirty others. The Federation has friends among Suni Moslems and is not going to come out with anything too condemnatory. Some would say that “we liberals” don’t recognize Evil when we see it. Let’s say that the eventual execution of this man is a given. We still want to know the truth about what causes people to stress out in the military. I don’t believe his actions were a part of any “organized terrorist movement” and I don’t believe he was in a “terrorist cell”. I find it an interesting of note that he attended the same mosque as two of the 9 – 11 hijackers, but I don’t think the coincidence goes beyond this. Some may say that all of Islam is evil because the New Testament does not contain any teachings to go out and kill infidels. But most theologians will also tell you that God’s nature doesn’t change with the course of time (unless you’re dispensationally minded) and as such it’s the same blood thirsty God of the Old Testament giving these injunctions to waste people in genocidal fashion- - the same God also said “Love thy neighbor as yourself” but even that phrase was lifted from the old testament, so it was not new with Jesus. But if you are like me, who believes that “You are what you do” then there is a far more powerful reason not to somehow “elevate” Christianity above Islam. And that is in church practice over thousands of years the church has “modeled” what it regards as “proper behavior” for us, much as a parent models it for a child. Other than the Nazis, and those eery similarities between sayings of Adolph Hitler and Martin Luther, there are also of course the Crusades and the Inquisition and the Salem Witch Trials, and the wars in places such as Lebanon and Ireland, which were over religion. If “violence is as American as cherry pie” I guess “War” is as much Christian as giving alms to the poor or becoming a missionary to Africa. In short, the church has no monopoly on morality or Righteousness. As George Washington’s blog pointed out, the word “Justice” is used over two hundred times in the Bible, but who is listening out there?

But that’s not primarily what I was intending to talk about today. What I want to do, what I need to do for my own mental clarity, is to probe the “physicality” of souls and deeds in the After Life. I believe we can deduce the ideas that “drive” an individual by looking at their deeds. They may not be conscious ideas. They may be “thought viruses” (or engrams) like that individual on Public Television says. But they are ideas none the less. Those Christians who say “Deeds don’t matter” in my opinion are flouting God, and as you know scripture, which they profess to revere, says “God is not mocked. Whatever a man sows he shall also reap”. And in one of my rare quotes of Chuck Swendoll, it’s a truism that “When we reap, the thing will be in a different (more matured) form than when we sowed it, and we will reap in a “different season”. I believe for so many of us that “different season” will be death. President Obama alluded to the hereafter in his speech at the military funeral the other say, saying that we face not only justice on earth, but in the hereafter. How we probe the physicality of thoughts and the souls with whom these thoughts are associated? First of all I would again like to use that word “telestial” to refer to this realm. I had a strange revelation this morning. Evil is just as “necessary” as Good is in this universe. Of course I define evil as “the circle” and good as “the straight line”. People may be impacted by Evil for a short season. Let me liken this to seeing Mercury behind the sun in a different place during a total eclipse because light was bent. But scientists tell us that not light but it is space itself that became “bent” in kind of an initial stage of a hyperbola. How do we use this principle to say that Good is “bent” by Evil, but it has to be because to be straight it has to be bent by space. Taking a human life is one way. For those like me who base justice on the accountant’s model, this poses no problem. You take a life and your forfeit a life. It’s just that simple. But for the “Thou shalt not kill” crowd, they see ANY act of taking a human life as evil. But the book of Joshua says to “go neither to the right nor to the left” and this is just what light does, even in bent space. It’s bent by evil but some would argue that this “bending” is “necessary”. Are you still wish me here?

Now I would like to set up another model for you. This side of “Infinity” and the other side of infinity, that we will call hyper-light-speed, or hyper mass or hyper space and all of that. We know that thoughts and ideas can be viewed as Objects. Those of you programmers might think of them as functions. Now functions “process information” and tell you “how to think about it”. This is what an Idea does. It draws from stimulation or “input” and out on the other side comes the emotive content of the idea. We don’t think of “Ideas” as special, or occupying space. An idea is a thing unto itself and everything the idea needs to exist is contained within itself. Christians, for one, are interested not only in What the idea is but asks the question “who owns it”. In other words who possesses “legal title” to the idea? Most ideas originate, or are associated with specific people who propose them. And if two people should have what appears to be the same idea, they needn’t be “existentially identical” to the people who first came up with them. The model I would like to use now is from Optics, where “Infinity” is but another line on a camera focus setting. On “this side” of infinity we have what we call “an apparent image” and on the other side you have what is known as “The real image”. You may feel like swapping out these terms in your mind, but dig this: A real image is something which focuses on a point. And I believe the “point” is where this side of infinity meets the other side. I have spoken of the karmic parabola. But some purist gemotrists out there may correct me and call it a circular “hyperbola” because of its ninety degree spread. Now in my Prophecy book I invisioned this karmic funnel, which I have often spoken of, as eventually “flattening out” so that as it were “the circular grid lines eventually reached “escape volicity” where the circle becomes just a slight hyperbola. (see previous reference with my 3D cones example, or look it up) I believe at this point, for purposes of this example illustrating the “telestial” realm, that these circles never reach their escape volicity, so circles they remain. Astronomy said that without Gravity, all of time and space would come to an end. If you’re like me you don’t want that to happen just yet, even in the after life. In fact, since “circles” are possessive, if a line reaches “escape velocity” then it has broken the circle and “broke the rules” and you know what happens when you break the rules as a course of habitual conduct in any game or athletic contest. You know what happens: You get kicked out of the game. You’re not allowed to “play” any more. You’ve left the Universe. I believe there is a place in the Universe for such hyper-space that is karma related. Of course Dante deals in circles both as to describing Heaven and also in describing Hell. So the concept is not new.

And now we come to the fifth and final movement of this expository symphony. I would do separate postings but to quote Charles Laughlin, “To have to hear this ghastly testimony in installments would prove unendurable!” Let’s get back to the whole hyperbolic thing. First of all I was intrigued by the E = M C squared equation, but it puzzled me, because anything accelerated to the speed of light by Einstein’s own writing is moving at an infinite speed through time, or in other words, all movement has stopped, and the last time I checked, energy was movement. In fact I in the past have said that part of the definition of Life is the implicit movement gradually through time, where the object evolves in its natural course. But in terms of physicality, we could look at the hyperbolic cosine of one, to say that at the speed of light, the physicality has a root presence but in terms of the sine, its life force is zero. Also its tangent, which could be rated as the efficiency or “actualization” of the individual, this too is at zero with the speed of light. This is the theoretical “point” at the bottom of our funnel, that some would say is never reached because there is no bottom. The same would be said on a logarithmic stock price chart, but we know stocks “crash” to zero all the time, and this represents a figurative orbit that has crashed. Now I observed a strange fact about the whole hyperbolic theory in that it seems as if the whole thing could be graphed on a chart that Base E logarithmic in the horosontal direction. Many like the Wickepedia make reference to the turquoise “A” triangle image, which I don’t exactly understand except that it’s “One” based. When a number goes to One the tangent is .76. I have said that if all life can be reduced to a fifty fifty odds of success, then if you do two tries at something you have a 75% probability that what you are experimenting on is valid. If you look at the hyperbola thing Base E based - - then everything on the left of the chart involves smaller and smaller measurements. The physicality of an object is never lower than at x – 0, or the speed of light. We define physicality here as something which in the hyper space realm can be perceived as actual. Ideas occupy hyper space. They man MAKE their own space to BE. As they grow the circle enlarges. One theory argues that the "ocelation freqquency" rises with the size of this circle, but the Size of the ocelations or "waves" remains constant so as the circles are traversed time is perceived to be in more abondance with more ocelations per traversing. In this model, physicality is the only means of measuring Life in this sub light realm. As the figure x goes up to Base E multiples of the speed of light, both the “alive” ness and the psychic physicality of an entity increases, but the tangent or “actualization” can only very nearly approach one. One can argue that if this number ever exceeded One, then escape volicoty would be reach and the entity would be expelled from this Universe. This Universe to review, is within the formatting of the bubble described in a previous posting. In this karmic funnel construct, the complexity of the thought makes up its increasing physicality. As Scientology teaches, the Life force (the Sine) would reach Death were the entity be slowed to the speed of light wherein all life forces would stop, physicality would be reduced to its lowest possible Point (literally) and the actualization (tangent) would be at zero. “Bye!”

No comments: