Brieching Infinity

The title in itself has the conottation of something almost blasphanus going on, as though it were something "We humans wern't supposed to do". I'm typing this now so you people on the East Coast can read me at ten o clock. Why make people wait when you have news? For those of you who did not read the previous posting I strongly suggest that you do, as well as all the "paragraphs" I have done in recent postings in this blog and the last, on this metaphysical subject. On my last postings I made reference to the speed of light as a "zero" point. One should keep in mind that subjectively light travel is instantaneous. Astronomy Cafe illustrated this reality to me where light is instantaneous in travel with respect to gravity thus bringing to light the "What you see is what you get" principle. Some may point out that I have the matter shrinkage and expansion rates all wrong. They will say that as you move away from the speed of light (slowing down) that shrinkage rates are less and not more, as I seemed to imply. On the other hand we view light on This Side of Infinity, and keep in mind that functionally we are talking about infinity or "the fastest speed possible". If you add increments of base E or increase the speed of travel by steady increments of 2.71 - - times faster with every increment, you can do that till the cows come home and you will STILL never achieve the speed of light. So when I start as it were "from the other end" and work back, don't knock the math. The whole hyperbolic equation of x squared minus x squared equals one, is a hyperbola when graphed out. How some will say "where does base E come in?". These are increments added later to give you a formula. You can still calibrate the chart with logarithmic increments. But this is not to preclude the intent of these calculations by scientists with grater minds than I do. Much in the same way if - - you look at the animated diagram in Wickipedia, you won't see actual degree markings in circular trig functions, so you won't see the base E calibration markings son their hyperbola chart. What you have to ask yourself is "what speed is infinity divided by Base E? It's an "infinetessible" increment. Which is why the physicality line goes off the chart. Capish?

The Federation brieched the Infinity alias the speed of light barrier at least four or five thousand years ago and perhaps as long as 13,000 years ago. We know that in Biblical times that "men began seeing angels". We don't know if this was a new phenomenon to mankind on this planet at that time. But Federation people tell me this morning that both space warping and traveling in hyperspace are similar technologies and if anything space warping is easier because it involves the generating or projecting artificial or synthisized gravity off into space (brieching the infinity barrier) rather than turning man's physical body into "energy" or whatever it turns into, for travel in hyper space. Earth should be experiancing this technology in a few decades.

Finally, in none of these "ramblings" on my part to I allow any place for God. Now the traditional deist view allows for "action" or "involvement" on God's part only for events beyond the realm of this Universe and the space and time of this Universe in what you could call the "Simple" view of the Big Bang theory. (simple as opposed to multiple) But in my writings we have apparently eliminated the need for this "all encompasing event that proves the existance of God". However we still have physical laws of science, and even in a world of chaos there is some sort of "design". To say that pure Science is God, is kind of to call God the "Logos" or "study".