Let me just ease my way
around to my topic sentence. It’s a fact
of life that if someone has your password and has access to any account you
have - - there is nothing to stop them from just changing the password and not
telling you the new one, thus locking you out of your own account. There seems to be a lot of police paranoia
about videos. In one case today, there
was this guy when the cops came into his apartment wanting to search the place
in case he were harboring criminals- - I would have just let them. But that just might be a mistake too and I’ll
tell you why. I’ve seen more of those “Cops”
shows than I care to admit where an officer says “Can I look around your car
kind of quick like?” in a cheerful voice.
It never ends well. If it were me
I’d answer any question an officer cares to know like “Where are you coming
from and where are you going?” Those who
don’t in my opinion appear to be looking for trouble. One guy had police under video surveillance in
his own apartment and apparently one of the cops just shined a flashlight
continually at the camera blinding it.
There is another case where a guy was yards from his own property and an
officer says “We want you to answer a few questions for us” and the guy kept
walking on into his house. Five minutes
later the place was swarming with police cars and officers had the house
surrounded talking to each other on their radios. Then there is a case on the New Jersey boardwalk
where some undercover beach patrol took exception to this guy shooting Videos
with a bunch of his friends on the pier.
The guy thought this guy was an obnoxious jerk and ignored him. Later a bunch of officers followed him and
showed up at his house. Now for the
punch line. According to Bill Carol, the
police now are “requesting” that you give them your private passwords to your
video surveillance cameras so that the police can “check up on you” any time
they care to. They say “It will make
our jobs easier for us in case of any terrorist threat”, as though that happens
every day. Bill Carol says “No” to
this. He will be a good citizen and
report anything he sees out of the order- - but he’s not going to turn over his
passwords over to the police. The police
are overbearing for sure. Race is still
an issue. In one case a bunch of cops
(?) watch this one Black guy like a hawk any time he goes into a convienience
store to make sure he doesn’t shoplift, and yet white kids routinely shoplift
there all the time and they do nothing about it. Thom Hartman says if he’s ever in “the wrong
side of town” an officer might stop him but merely to ask if he needs help and
to make sure he’s safe”. It’s what you
call White privilege- - that invisible backpack of special passports every
White person gets when they are born that gives them an instant leg up. In another case there was this Black guy out
with his black friend- - and both people were rounded up by the police because
there was a crime “committed by a Black man” in the area- - so the police just
round up every Black person in the neighborhood regardless of whether any other
evidence fits the crime.
Two brothers - - Black,
of course- - were released from a North Carolina prison after thirty years
because in 1986 they were convicted of raping and murdering an eleven year old
girl and when they found her she had her panties shoved in her mouth. In fact Justice Scelia used to refer to this
case as “An outstanding reason why we should never get rid of the death penalty”. But of course now we have DNA evidence and
both brothers were exonerated and released, hopefully with a new suit of
clothes and some cash in their pockets.
Apparently they aren’t bitter about it.
Bill Press says he would certainly be bitter about it- and so would
I. I would want to make sure “someone
paid” somewhere, somehow. There have
just been so many of these Death Row cases where later they were exonerated by
DNA evidence, which didn’t exist till not too many years before the OJ case in
1994. Bill Press says that it’s been
proven that keeping these convicts on Death Row all those years is just more
expensive- - then doing what Pat Brown once suggested we do with murderers of “Dropping
them in a hole and forgetting about them”.
There is a theory that
the reason why Black young men pose as such macho dudes all the time in public
with women and such and talk about bashing “Ho”s around- is because these young
Black men are repressed in their masculinity because of the matriarchal situation
they face at home with a dominant single parent mother. Out on the street they are Mr. Macho stud,
but once they close the door at home it’s “Yes mam, no mam, anything you way
mam.” I have had a small taste of this
in my youth with a bullying brother. So
once I leave the house I change my attitude and what standards I’ll accept from
other people. I’m wondering whether
Black kids would be less likely to join a college fraternity because of
this. By the way I didn’t know that
hazing was illegal in this state. From
everything I’ve heard- - I thought college hazing was getting worse and more
lift threatening all the time. I would
not join a fraternity- - so maybe I have a little of that “Black mentality”
going on myself. I think it may also be
true with why Blacks are pretty cold to the idea of a gay lifestyle or in any
way being seen as anything other than totally masculine. They want to assert their masculinity because
they feel repressed. But of course times
are different today. My Dad used to
smoke cigars regularly in the car, as did Bill Carol’s. That would be frowned on today. He said he didn’t want his young son taking “selfies”
of himself in his underwear making faces at the camera on his daddy’s cell
phone, because someone might see it (like an officer who asks to see his cell
phone) and he might have some explaining to do.
It’s a paranoid age. These days
you don’t see eleven year old boys on bicycles delivering the neighborhood
newspaper. Today they are “drive by’s”
thrown from a truck. In terms of the “Home alone” thing- - the past hour I've been thinking that over. I think we had lady babysitters up through about the middle of 1960, at least some of the time. But I do have a specific recollection of the fall of 1960 when I was starting fifth grade that we were alone while parents were taking an investment night class. They wanted to know what to do with all the money they got from finally selling the Weschester house in August of 1960 and they were advised to invest in Disney stock because "Disney was in a slump". They didn't, and my Mom regretted it. But now they want to make it some kind of a statute like no younger than twelve or something. Certainly nobody used seat belts assuming
the car you were in even had seat belts.
And today they have these absurd booster seats. And of course I have ridden in the back of a
pick-up truck a time or two in my youth.
It never entered anybody’s mind that you had to be strapped in. To hear Judy talk (about the government) you
might come to wonder if even the standard church potluck or picnic was still
legal. People tell me that in shoe
stores, they used to routinely have these X ray cameras in there where anybody
could stick their feet in and see their bones.
Israel has illegally
conthiscated the natural gas fields off shore from Gaza according to George
Washington’s blog, which put out an extensive, thorough posting on this
subject. They are working out a natural
gas export deal with Jordan right now.
They say “This changes the basic energy situation with Israel, which now
makes them an exporter rather than an importer of energy. So much of what Israel has done throughout
their history is illegal, it seems. But
everybody insists on giving them a pass because after all “They’re Israel” and
part of that Judeo-Christian American tradition which Newt Gingrich and Sean
Hannity are always talking about.
President Obama, as you
know, is going to deliver a major address to the American people on Wednesday
evening on going to war with ISIS. If I
heard right, Norman Goldman was just saying that there will be NO war authorization
act voted out of both houses of congress because the Senate and House will
never agree in provisions. I have a
democratic senator’s plan all cure up right now and ready to go. Yes, congress is back today so send in the
clowns! Of course the big news of the
weekend is how Mitt Romney went on FOX news and pretty much put the President
in his place, stating the republican point of view- - shall we say, more
intelligently and diplomatically than you’d hear from Rush or Hannity. There of course is that Romney surge in the
polls now, as presumably everybody has “buyer’s remorse” in voting for
President Obama less than two years ago.
Because a very good point can be made there would be much less strife in
the nation today and the economy could be doing a whole lot better than it is now
under Obama. But not only that, but with
Obama gone so would that “boogyman” be gone- for Republicans to make a
continued whipping boy of. The democrats
right now would psychologically be in a whole lot stronger place- - with Mitt
Romney in the White House.

No comments:
Post a Comment