Well now Sean Hannity is taking us on a blast to the past of the bad old days of the height of the Iraq War. Fourteen percent of Americans say that they would be open to sending US troops back to Iraq. As it turns out President Obama is sending in a few hundred to guard the US Embassy, that elaborate complex of buildings the US invested so much money in building. People talk as if the United States designed this building complex right in the heart of Baghdad as if we intended to remain there fifty years to protect "our oil" I guess.. So, I guess that's how it starts. We send in troops to protect the Embassy, and then we send in other troops to protect those troops and it builds from there. I never new Tony Orlando was such a war monger. I thought 'Tie A Yellow Ribbon" was just a song that could be about anything you wanted it to be about. But you know what else yellow ribbons are used for, Police Crime Scene tape. They rope off an area as a sign to civilians "This is a crime scene, stay away". But Sean and Tony don't have the good sense to come on a war scene and stay the hell out of it. Tony Orlando went so far as to play the Armageddon card and start talking about the Bible and World War III and scenarios I was flirting with in the mid seventies, till I came to my senses. I guess a number of civilians were shot execution style in a ditch in Iraq just the past 24 hours or something. Sean and Tony don't have the balls to go into the theater of battle themselves however. Why don't they and Ted Nugent and Cliven Bundy and anybody else who has a trigger finger and repressed sexual urges- - to just go on over to Iraq and have at it! We'll see how brave they are then. Just like when George Bush left his post in Texas where his unit was station and he went off on a months long drinking spree in Alabama, and nobody had the nerve to bring it up in any campaign. Of course I'm waiting with baited breath to see how Sean answers one caller who said "Either we should go and prepare to stay there thirty years or longer in a major "nation building' crusade, or else we should pack up our things and go home and take care of our own problems". Sean's answer is that "Well since our own borders aren't even secure thanks to Obama, we know we need to be worried about this "staging area" in Iraq now for terrorism to be planned for attacks on this country". He also mentioned something about drilling for more oil here on a massive basis. Sean and Tony Orlando were saying that Benjuamin Netenyahoo is the only "World Leader" now that will stand up to terrorism. And Sean had other little news item to darken our day. There is the President of Nigeria saying that those school girls will probably never be found. Then there are 48 people killed in Kenya by an Islamist terrorist group. Then there are eleven men who had their fingers cut off by the Talliban for voting the wrong way, to keep them from showing their "purple finger". The question is how much if any of this will show up in the evening news. I thought if we learned one thing late last summer was that the American people DO NOT want to go to war- - ANY war- - and the Republican Congress went along with the wishes of the American people. Are Sean Hannity and Tony Orlando saying that the American congress voted wrong? Just what is Col Hannity's war strategy. Does Sean have any sort of battle plans or is he just making with the mouth on nation-wide radio?
Bill Carol or whoever on KFI was saying that now there is proof that the IRS scandal involving "targeting" the tea party is a real scandal. It seems that EVERY E mail from or to Louise Fletcher or whatever her name is- - is now mysteriously missing- - deleted. And according to Carol, not even the most skilled computer hacks are able to retrieve these deleted files. And also we are informed that President Obama today is releasing twelve more Islamic prisoners from Guantanamo. That one is bad politics and a little "tone deaf" as far as to how it will play with the public at this time. But before I leap to any wild conclusions I would like background material on these twelve. Finally Sean Hannity was talking about how the Obama administration now after two years has finally arrested the ring leader of the Bengazi attacks on 9 - 11 -2012. But strangely, according to Hannity, this guy was never in hiding and reporters from all over the country and all over the world have been granted hours long interviews with this terrorist ring leader. Here again I confess to not being up to speed on this one as to just exactly why the Obama administration knew about this ring leader and he was definitely the one they've been looking for, yet concealed it from the American public for two years. This whole thing has shades of Nicole Walker all over it. (never mind the inside reference) But apparently though this ring leader was in plain sight he had to be "captured" by our Special Forces, brave fighting men. So all this news in this paragraph and the last one, has broken in the past few hours. And of course we hear also that fighting has actually broken out in Baghdad itself with the ISIS group. So it would seem as if Iran didn't arrive in time to prevent hostilities from spreading into the Iraqi capital itself. Of course Sean Hannity says we can't trust Iran to do our job for us. My response is "They're already there and we aren't, so maybe we had just better thank heaven for small favors. But it's like Hartman says. For these people on the right end of the political spectrum, it's "All war all the time" when these people are in perfect bliss. It's kind of like a sugar high I guess, only it's a hell of a lot more expensive to maintain, at the cost of the lives of US Armed Forces, and countless of the enemy.
Last night I watched the Judy video up to the 35
minute mark, and I must say Judy did a pretty good of summarizing the points
this guy in the video made. I have a
pretty good grasp of where this guy is at.
But I suspect that just maybe this guy is over simplifying things a bit
by saying “These cells that grow and multiply only have a fix amount of time in
which to do it, and if time runs out the cells remain for life in whatever
incomplete state they were in. He kept
speaking of the methyl molecule, and the name for it is methane- - . But he spoke of it as some magic catalyst
that enables everything to happen. I
just have trouble buying into the notion that you can literally alter your DNA
by nutrition, and pass on the beneficial or harmful results of your own
activated DNA to the next generation. So forget what you learned in ninth grade biology- - genes aren't permanent but according to this guy are in a continual state of flux depending on what you ate last night.
Before this it was all
about the drug “Molly”, which is supposedly MDMA or ecstasy, but these days you
could find almost anything in it. I’ll keep that in mind at my next party. It's in the nature of the youth to not check anything out but just dive in head first into whatever kind of party drug your best friend (who you just met ten minutes ago) offers you. Nobody knows what kind of shit is in that drug you're taking. It could be MDMA but it could also be something like Methadone, or perhaps animal tranqualizer (angel dust?) or perhaps some hallucinogen. For some people in their late teens, the more dangerous, the better. I would just advise young people that - whether you want to believe it or not- - your frontal lobes aren't fully developed yet and won't be fully till your mid twenties- - and that your judgement is severely in question. We had Polish sausage for dinner with
generous sour krout and peppers, and the sliced potatoes were good. I had seconds but they were out of
potatoes. We had two chocolate chip
cookies for desert.
I had Stephanie Miller
on before breakfast and have her on now.
I was in much better spirits this morning than I was either yesterday or
Sunday. We had a good breakfast. I got a double plate, and I don’t know if
that was by accident or design but I benefited from it. All three pieces of toast were eaten
dry. So I had two fried eggs and two
hashed browns with catsup swizzle. We
had oatmeal in a bowl filled to the brim.
Stephanie now is wondering why all of the networks had Republicans on
who were all for the Iraq war to begin with, and not have one person seemingly,
that warned of “This is the very sort of thing we feared happening if we had
this war”. Why weren’t those people
invited on any of these shows? It’s
almost as if progressives are “not allowed to be right” by the media, even when
they are. (Selah)Mc Cain is really crying
in his beer over the loss of Iraq. Mc
Cain beat Romney in the 2008 primary over the War issue, because Romney was
saying then (and they played a speech from Dec 2007) to the effect that we needed
to develop some plan for withdrawal from Iraq.
That was the death knell of his campaign. But George Bush 41 is still active at his age
and jumped out of an airplane on his birthday.
It's time to talk about the dimensions of "Things" and by things, we mean at least hypothetically possible things. There are other things - - like a way to reconcile all Scripture in the Bible to one unified meaning, or some way to make all professing "Believers" happy with the results in Heaven. It dawned on me that when a Christian or the Church demands (rather than just asks) something from you, it's not because he had a use for what you have. It's NOT a question of your Giving anything of or from yourself to Him or The Church. After all to these people you're pretty Worthless anyhow. They don't really WANT in most cases anything you have or any tallent you have. They likely will even "look down on someone like you in your economic status". So why then? In their minds (and the thought just hit me today) their goal is rather what they can Take from you just for the Sport of it, to prove they CAN. It's like when they want you to confess Jesus as Lord, they don't CARE whether or not it's a salvation that "takes" for you but rather that they GOT you to DO it, is all that matters to them.. (selah) To reconsile all of the moral teachings of the Bible into one unified seamless fabric- - is impossible. Certain things mental patients claim to be real, are not even Hypothetically possible, if you break down the logical consequences of the things they are specifying (saying). So we now move on to "Things" that you and I deal with every day, and we have said that physical "Things' come in four aspects. First is your awareness of them. Another aspect of "Things" would be their function, or some might just call it theirs or anyone's "Destiny". This cannot be varied from. When you think about it it is as Impossible to change our destiny while living in this Universe- - as for a computer to suddenly "decide" it doesn't like how it's been programmed and "Will itself' to follow a different program. And Revelations reminds us that our program and that of the Cosmos itself- - was "programmed in" as the Bible says "Before the foundation of the earth. Do you now see the absurdity of the idea of God being some being whom you can "get to like you" if somehow you can just "prove to him that you're really a good guy". Things also have Form. Form could be called the "instruction code for building the object" that requires an Intelligence of design. The mere concept of a Form entails the concept of a plan or structure- - or some sort of deduced thought process. We move on to gravity and mass, or the fourth aspect of Things. Some may ask "Does mass change depending on how close to the speed of light it is traveling at?" Let me answer that by this reply. The question is NOT - - is one object "faster" or "closer to the speed of light' than another. Put out of your Mind the concept that- - there is ANY distinction between Your point of view and the Object's point of view. BOTH are Just as VALID. Sorry, you absolutists, that's just the way it is. As such it is an absurdity to say if this object is - - OK from a moral standpoint it would be ludicris to say that object A was "better" than object B. People like Sean Hannity will never accept this. I doubt they can. They haven't the mental grasp. So that object that you see moving either Tword you or Away from you (this is the key) can be said or "observed" to be of a higher or lower mass, but "Observing don't make it so". All you need do is to Match the Speed of the other object and both measurements will be identical. This will put an end to all argument. And normally would not even endeavor to measure a moving object anyhow. If you match the speed of the other object- - there is no problem. No shrunken or increased mass- - no nothing. As such how do you ever "Prove" that the two objects were ever different? (Selah)
No comments:
Post a Comment