It seems that the American Public will believe anything the media tells them. The past couple of weekends has featured on the news interview programs an almost coronation of our new Royal couple, Bill and Hillary Clinton. The Clintons have dominated shows such as Meet the Press and "This Week". And now there is the famous "Hillary laugh" that is in the news. I take that laugh to be she is so out of touch with reality when an attempt is made to answer a question, she just doesn't know where to begin. We continue to hear that Hillary and Rudy are our anointed nominees of the respective political Parties. In California they even engage in circular reasoning saying we need Hillary because she's the only one that can beat Rudy, and the Republicans are saying they need Rudy because she's the only one that can defeate Hillary. Even people like Pat Buchannon and Anne Colter by their passive resignation have almost endourced this dynamic duo of Rudy and Hillary. Buchannon has as much as said Hillary is virtually unbeatable, whereas Anne Coulter has said that conservatives will probably end up voting for Giuliani. The spirit just isn't there for any third party because they would know it would be political suicide.
I'd like to know what the appeal of Hillary is. " I guess you heard about the outdoor resturant smoking ban in Beverly Hills. My biggest fear with Hillary being president is that she will try and micro manage all our lives with rules about tollarence for gays in grammar school or corporal punishment, or being busted for smoking around kids, or what foods can be sold in school, or somehow rewriting US History to remove all references to God. I'd like to know what Hillary's basic appeal is. If it's universal health care will that care be at "the lowest comon denominator". I think [name withheld] could have gotten better hospital care if they paid the whole bill themselves or something like fifty years ago before they had medi-care. A lot of conservatives say "You don't WANT health care like they have in Europe". (the preceeding was from an e mail) Personally I'm disappointed in that "The Clintons" still stand behind their pro NAFTA decision when Clinton was in power. If you will remember it was Democrat Al Gore who advocated for NAFTA whereas Ross Perot was wisely against NAFTA. Now Bill is still saying NAFTA was and is a great thing. How does Thom Hartman feel about that, if he's going to vote for Hillary? Now World Net Daily is bringing up past political shady dealing by Hillary. The other day I heard that when the Clintons left the White House in 2001 they stole valuable things from the White House (like the silverware or something). I don't see how all that political corruption stuff from the nineties that Rush Limbaugh talked about is "just going away". What we need desperately is a third party candidate who is squeaky clean politically and isn't corruptable. I'd vote for that candidate. I just don't see why we're locked into two bad choices a year and a month before the election and over three months before the first vote is cast in the Primaries. Someone is trying to drive down the voter turn-out when the primaries do come, in some sort of a self fulfilling prophecy. Where do you go if you think government is spending too much money? Where do you go if you're fed up with this Securety mass paranoia? Where do you go if you're morally opposed to abortion? Where do you go if you don't want government micro-managing our daily lives? Where do you go, most importantly of all to find a candidate who won't continue to polarize America they way it's been polarized the last eight years?
Now the latest message the media is cramming down our collective throat is the idea that "The economic crisis is over". The Real Estate crisis is solved. The President has taken action and now the stock market is happy and is headed for new highs. I said quite a number of months ago in reference to a Sylvia Brown remark about "October" that, "Even if there is some kind of rally in October it won't last. It will be the last hurrah before the crash". I said that the economy would crash just about the start of the new year 2008. I see no reason to divert from this prediction now. We also have the upcoming War in Iran to worry about in addition to the falling (collapsing) US Dollar. People from Randy Rhodes to World Net Daily are reminding us that the War with Iran will be no picnic. China is happy that our economy is just about to go under and preporations may already be being made to pull the plug on the US dollar. And of course both Russia and China are allied with Iran so if we declare war on Iran we will really be at war with Russia. The media has us so hyped up on the necessity of War with Iran now we take it as a necessity and a foregone conclusion. We need to get over this fantasy that "the worst is behind us". Violence is down in Iraq. If this is so shouldn't we relax a little and celebrate, rather than to go ahead and plunge headlong into the next war? Is George Bush that much of a War Junky that the prospect of even a few months of peace anywhere terrifies him?
Clarence Thomas is in the news again. Needless to say that Clarence Thomas is a man who disgusts me. He is NOT a credit to his race because all the things people don't like about Blacks are manifest in Thomas. In saying this I apologize to everyone of color because Thomas has so little in common with anyone else of his race it's hardly funny. He's really a guy in a KKK sheet that happens to have colored skin. He talks about this "High tech lynching" he underwent in 1991 before congress. Howard Stern has remarked about the "stacks of pornography" that Thomas has in his home. Now Thomas has taken again to attacking Anita Hill's performance in the work place. If there was one thing that was certain it was that Thomas regarded Anita Hill as a good and faithfull employee. How Thomas is just lashing out angrily at everybody. He won't lash out at racial injustice, but he'll lash out at the very people who voted him into power. I didn't see the Sixty Minutes interview. I was coming home from a funeral at that time. Actually about one minute of a Clarence Thomas rant is about all I can take.
There are three women I'd like to tip my hat to because they have gotten a bum deal. One is that Chicano lover of Mayor Antonio Viragoso. This was a news reporter for a Spanish speaking TV station who got suspended, and then apparently fired, for being involved with the Mayor. Meanwhile nothing happens to him. I don't think the affair is anybody's business at this point. Next is Lady Dianna. There are the three haunting questions. Was she engaged? Was she pregnent? Was she murdered? 31 % of British subjects believe her death was not an accident, and now they're going to have another investigation. I think someone should do a movie in the tradition of Oliver Stone and just "lay it all out there" and say that there were people who wanted her dead, and just fill in the detales in a movie plot. Lastly, I'd like to extend my sympathies to Brittany Speers. Stewart Sutcliffe of the Orion Federation said we would come through for her and we didn't. Speers is just overwhelmed by negative forces that now are taking her two young sons from her and this is a sad thing. It's like the public is fickle. They love you one week and hate you another. I just hope that Brittany doesn't get murdered in the next few weeks, because if she does you know some wise-ass attorney out there is going to say that it was Suicide, and we all know better.
There is some Orion Federation news I'm now going to mention- - briefly. There is a group tagged the "Zachery lobby" that is causing trouble- - and trying to say I don't deserve to have anything do do with the Federation because I call myself a Christian. This is the same group that during the Cassiopian takeover of 1990 and1991 got rid of the real "Mal Evans" and put in a fake Mal Evans they could control. But when "Operation Mongoose" got rid of all the other Cassiopians, they hid in the shadows and escaped. Stewart and I launched a demand for investrigation of them last Saturday. Oddly this is also a fanatically "Pro Apple Corporation" group. They are all in favor of the I Phone self destructing if you try and modify it. In a Federation ruling that came out they came up with the ruling that "Corporate profits are a creature of the state. Corporations can't make huge profits unless state laws give them the Power to make profits through patent laws and such". It was stated that they ripped off the Beatles with the use of the name Apple and haven't got a leg to stand on.
No comments:
Post a Comment